UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
RAYMOND JOHNSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

5th Cir. | 1972-09-01
No. 72-1973
466 F.2d 508 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1972) Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Johnson appeals his conviction of knowingly and intentionally distributing a specific amount of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a)(1). The single issue raised here is whether the trial judge committed reversible error by admitting into evidence an out of court statement of Johnson’s co-defendant.

We hold he did not. The statement was unquestionably made in furtherance of a combination or concert of action between Johnson and his co-defendant to accomplish the illegal distribution ; as importantly, there was sufficient evidence, independent of the statement itself, to establish the combination or concert.

Hence, the statement was correctly admitted as an exception to the hearsay rule. McGregor v. United States, 422 F. 2d 925 (5th Cir. 1970); Holsen v. United States, 392 F. 2d 292 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1029, 89 S.Ct. 640, 21 L.Ed.2d 573 (1969); see United States v. Williamson, 450 F. 2d 585 (5th Cir. 1971); United States v. Fischetti, 450 F. 2d 34 (5th Cir. 1971); United States v. Nall, 437 F. 2d 1177 (5th Cir. 1971); Orser v. United States, 362 F. 2d 850 (5th Cir. 1966); C. McCormick, Law of Evidence § 244 at 521-24 (1954).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw