UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
ANGEL DEL VALLE-ROJAS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to withdraw a guilty plea, nor was the right of confrontation abridged.
Appellant pleaded guilty to aiding illegal entry of aliens and later moved to withdraw the plea before sentencing, claiming innocence. The government …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prejudice To The Government cases and more on FLexlaw
[*229] PER CURIAM:
Appellant was convicted upon his guilty plea of aiding and abetting illegal entry of aliens, a misdemeanor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 8 U.S.C. § 1325. He now appeals, contending that he should have been allowed to withdraw his guilty plea and that his right to confront the witnesses against him was abridged.
Appellant moved to withdraw his guilty plea on the day set for his sentencing. He said he no longer felt he was guilty.
The government contested the motion, pointing out that it had relied on the guilty plea in releasing the key witnesses to return to Mexico and that their presence would be virtually impossible to obtain again. The government also pointed out that the appellant was an experienced offender and that he had bargained for a misdemeanor plea in this case, which had commenced as a felony prosecution.
While a withdrawal of a guilty plea should be freely allowed prior to sentencing, Kadwell v. United States, 315 F. 2d 667, 670-671 (9th Cir. 1963), there is no absolute right to change a plea. Sherman v. United States, 383 F. 2d 837, 840 (9th Cir. 1967). Rather, the decision is committed to the sound discretion of the district court. See United States v. Fragoso-Gastellum, 456 F. 2d 1287 (9th Cir. 1972); Leano v. United States, 457 F. 2d 1208 (9th Cir. 1972); United States v. Youpee, 419 F. 2d 1340, 1343 (9th Cir. 1969); Sherman v. United States, supra; Zaffarano v. United States, 330 F. 2d 114, 115 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 825, 85 S.Ct. 52, 13 L.Ed.2d 35 (1964). Prejudice to the government is one element to be weighed in the district court’s evaluation of a defendant’s motion. See, e. g., United States v. Lombardozzi, 436 F. 2d 878, 881 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 908, 91 S.Ct. 1379, 28 L.Ed.2d 648 (1971).
The guilty plea was taken in accordance with Fed.R.Crim.P. 11. After the government had released its witnesses, and they had disappeared into Mexico, the appellant understandably desired to reconsider his guilty plea. But the plea was valid, and it would be manifestly unjust to set it aside in the circumstances of this case. The district court did not abuse its discretion.
Appellant also contends that his right of confrontation was denied, because his attorney, without his knowledge and consent, had released two alien witnesses after interviewing them. The guilty plea came after the interview, and waived any second thoughts about witnesses.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Barker, 514 F.2d 208 (D.C. Cir. 1975)
-
United States v. Read, 778 F.2d 1437 (9th Cir. 1985)
-
United States v. Vasquez-Velasco, 471 F.2d 294 (9th Cir. 1973)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Sydney B. Kadwell v. United States, 315 F.2d 667 (9th Cir. 1963)
- United States v. Darrel Dwayne Youpee, 419 F.2d 1340 (9th Cir. 1969)
- Scolnick et ux. v. Lefkowitz, 379 U.S. 825 (U.S. 1964)
- Lombardozzi v. United States, 402 U.S. 908 (U.S. 1971)
- Certain Space in Prop. Known as Chimes Bldg. v. United States, 402 U.S. 908 (U.S. 1971)
- United States v. Carmine Lombardozzi, 436 F.2d 878 (2d Cir. 1971)
- Zaffarano v. United States, 330 F.2d 114 (9th Cir. 1964)
- Sherman v. United States, 383 F.2d 837 (9th Cir. 1967)
- Gil Munzo Leano v. United States, 457 F.2d 1208 (9th Cir. 1972)
- United States v. Heriberto Fragoso-Gastellum, 456 F.2d 1287 (9th Cir. 1972)