REAMER INDUSTRIES, INC., APPELLEE,
v.
MCQUAY, INC., APPELLANT
REAMER INDUSTRIES, INC., APPELLEE,
MCQUAY, INC., APPELLANT
462 F.2d 1372
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1972)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
This diversity action was instituted by Reamer Industries, Inc., against Me- Quay, Inc., for indemnification for monies which the plaintiff paid to a general contracting firm for repairs of fire damages to the Orangeburg-Calhoun Technical Education Center allegedly caused by defective fan coil heating and air conditioning equipment manufactured by McQuay.
The case was tried by the court without a jury and plaintiff was awarded judgment. Appellee, Reamer, has filed its motion for summary affirmance on the ground that “the appeal does not present any substantial questions of law or fact.”
Upon consideration of the record, the briefs, appellee’s motion for affirmance and appellant’s response thereto, we have dispensed with oral argument and now affirm on the opinion of the district court.1
Affirmed.
. Reamer Industries, Inc. v. McQuay, Inc., 344 F.Supp. 540 (D.C.S.C.1971).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Beulah Voisin Champagne v. Penrod Drilling Co., 459 F.2d 1042 (5th Cir. 1972)
-
Langfitt v. Fed. Marine Terminals, Inc., 647 F.3d 1116 (11th Cir. 2011)
-
Hartland Dean West v. Kerr-McGEE Corp., 765 F.2d 526 (5th Cir. 1985)