IN RE FORFEITURE OF ONE 1979 FORD V.I.N. 9G87F167035

Fla. 4th DCA | 1984-04-18
No. 83-1372
ANSTEAD, C.J., and LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
450 So. 2d 863 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal in a forfeiture case where the only connection shown between the vehicle forfeited and the appellant’s illegal activities was that the vehicle was used by the appellant to travel to and from a bar where appellant consummated an illegal drug transaction. We agree with the trial court that these facts constitute a sufficient showing of the use of the vehicle to facilitate or aid and abet in the commission of the illegal transaction to authorize forfeiture. See Chapter 932, Florida Statutes (1983) and In re Forfeiture of 1979 Toyota Corolla, 424 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Duckham v. State, 478 So. 2d 347 (Fla. 1985)
    …le of contraband within the meaning of subsection 932.702(3), Florida Statutes (1981).1 In reaching this conclusion the district court relied on One 1976 Dodge Van v. State, 447 So. 2d 984 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), and In re Forfeiture of One 1979 Ford, 450 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). In One 1979 Ford the appellant had used the vehicle only to travel to and from a bar where he consummated an illegal drug transaction. Relying on In re Forfeiture of 1979 Toyota Corolla, 424 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982),2 the…
  • State v. ONE (1) 1977 Volkswagen, 455 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
    …vehicle to facilitate the sale of contraband within the meaning of Section 932.702(3), and the state was entitled to an order of forfeiture. See One 1976 Dodge Van v. State, 447 So. 2d 984 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); and In Re: Forfeiture of One 1979 Ford, 450 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). Accordingly, the order appealed is REVERSED. THOMPSON, J., concurs. BARFIELD, J., dissents with opinion. BARFIELD, J., dissents: I dissent. The court has extended the application of the forfeiture statute to snare all motor…
  • Smith v. Caggiano, 496 So. 2d 853 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)
    …s in violation of section 842.25, Florida Statutes (1985). Accordingly, the Cadillac was contraband. See Duckham v. State, 478 So. 2d 347 (Fla.1985); One 1976 Dodge Van v. State, 447 So. 2d 984 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); In re Forfeiture of One 1979 Ford, 450 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith. GRIMES, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL, J., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw