WALTER L. LARSEN, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
AIR CALIFORNIA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that while reinstatement was not warranted, back pay was due for the employer's failure to provide a predischarge hearing.
A discharged airline copilot sued for reinstatement and back pay under Veterans' Re-employment Rights. The evidence conflicted on whether he was fired…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Findings Of Fact cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff, a discharged commercial airline copilot, brought action under 50 U. S.C. App. § 459(g) (4), and 50 U.S.C. App. § 459(c) (3) (Veterans’ Re-employment Rights), demanding reinstatement and back pay. He appeals a judgment granting partial back pay but denying reinstatement, 313 F.Supp. 218.
The crucial issue was whether plaintiff lost his job for requesting leave to attend military reserve drills or for unsatisfactory performance as a flight-crew member. The evidence was in sharp conflict on all material issues. The district judge observed the witnesses, heard and weighed the evidence, and made findings of fact adverse to the plaintiff. The record reveals no basis for disturbing those findings. Fed.R. Civ.P. 52(a).
While the trial court found no factual basis for ordering reinstatement, the court did find the defendant employer delinquent under 50 U.S.C. App. § 459 (g) (4) in failing to afford plaintiff a predischarge hearing pursuant to the defendant’s own personnel-policy manual. The court accordingly awarded damages of $2,500 for wages lost during the time necessary for the hearing to which plaintiff was entitled. The defendant has not cross-appealed.
Affirmed.