UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
FRANCIS X. MORIN, JR., ET AL. APPEAL OF ALBERT LAMOLINARE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FRANCIS X. MORIN, JR., ET AL. APPEAL OF ALBERT LAMOLINARE
458 F.2d 990
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1972)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Topics
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Aider And Abettor Liability cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The alleged objectionable statements in the jury instructions asserted for the first time in this court could have been easily remedied by the Trial Judge by simple curative language. Instead of raising these objections voiced in the district court, counsel for appellant expressed himself as “satisfied” with the charge. We can perceive no basis for sustaining the appeal on this issue. United States v. Chicarelli, 445 F. 2d 1111 (3 Cir. 1971).
There is sufficient evidence from which the jury could have inferred that the appellant was an aider and abettor in the Pittsburgh National Bank robbery. 18 U.S.C. § 2. This ground also is ineffectual. United States v. Bradley, 447 F. 2d 657, 659-660 (3 Cir. 1971).
We perceive no reversible error in this record. The judgment of conviction will be affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Hykel, 461 F.2d 721 (3d Cir. 1972)
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Chicarelli, 445 F.2d 1111 (3d Cir. 1971)
- United States v. Bradley, 447 F.2d 657 (3d Cir. 1971)