PLYMOUTH CITRUS PRODUCTS AND CORPORATE GROUP SERVICE, APPELLANTS,
v.
SARAH WOODARD, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Wage Loss Benefits cases and more on FLexlaw
BARFIELD, Judge.
In this workers’ compensation case the employer appeals the deputy commissioner’s final order awarding wage-loss benefits to claimant from April 13, 1983 to July 1, 1983 and awarding costs. We reverse.
Claimant sustained a work-related injury in December 1981. Her job in the canning industry was seasonal and subject to layoffs. The period for which wage-loss benefits were awarded in this case occurred during one such layoff. Although the deputy commissioner found that claimant had made an adequate job search during the period for which wage-loss benefits were claimed, he did not make a specific finding that claimant had satisfied her burden of establishing that the wage-loss was the result of the compensable injury. There is no competent substantial evidence in the record to support such a finding.
The order of the deputy commissioner dated August 12, 1983 is REVERSED.
ZEHMER, J. concurs. WENTWORTH, J., concurs specially with an opinion in which ZEHMER, J., concurs.
WENTWORTH, Judge,
concurring.
I agree that the work search evidence does not in this case establish a causal connection between wage loss and injury, but would note that benefits are not precluded simply because the period of wage loss occurred after a layoff unrelated to the compensable injury. In this case claimant had been a seasonal worker for 16 years, and the record evidence on the claim shows only a period of seasonal unemployment in the same pattern previously established. Work search under these circumstances, however adequate and unsuccessful, would not, standing alone, establish prima facie that her injury effected a change in her employment status entitling her to wage loss benefits. Cf., Lasher Milling Co. v. Brown, 427 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Regency Inn v. Johnson, 422 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Johnston v. Super Food Servs. & Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 461 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)…a period of successful post-injury employment, is attributable in some part to a non-injury-related factor such as economic conditions, seasonal layoff or discharge for a just cause such as excessive absenteeism. Plymouth Citrus Products v. Woodard, 450 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Williams Roofing, Inc. v. Moore, 447 So. 2d 968 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Lasher Milling Co. v. Brown, 427 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). This court set forth the governing rule in Williams Roofing: Whether a claimant has shown a…
-
Whalen v. U.S. Elevator & U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co., 486 So. 2d 670 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…eriod of successful post-injury employment, is attributable in some part to ... discharge for a just cause” unrelated to the injury. The Donut Shop et al. v. Farrington, 461 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), citing Plymouth Citrus Products v. Woodard, 450 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Williams Roofing, Inc. v. Moore, 447 So. 2d 968 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Lasher Milling Co. v. Brown, 427 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Johnston v. Super Food Services, Inc., 461 So. 2d 169, 170 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Whatever tem…
-
Anstead v. COX Broad. & CNA Ins., 500 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…r. We find there was competent substantial evidence to support the deputy’s finding that claimant was not a seasonal worker. This court has held that a job in the canning industry subject to layoffs is seasonal. Plymouth Citrus Products v. Woodard, 450 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). In this case there was testimony that commissions earned tended to increase substantially twice a year coinciding with the return of the student body to Gaines-ville for classes. However, claimant testified he worked full-time e…
Authorities Cited
- Regency INN v. Johnson, 422 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
- Lasher Milling Co. & Fla. Farm Bureau v. Brown, 427 So. 2d 1034 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)