ALPHONSO SANDERS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1984-05-22
No. 83-951
Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JOR-GENSON, JJ.
450 So. 2d 311 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s finding that the defendant violated his probation is affirmed. We nevertheless remand so that the trial court can correct the order of probation revocation to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement.

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Harris v. State, 514 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
    …We affirm the trial court’s order revoking the probation of the defendant Jeffrey Harris. We, nevertheless, remand to provide the trial court an opportunity to conform the written order of revocation to its oral pronouncement. See Sanders v. State, 450 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Affirmed and remanded.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw