UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
WILLIAM RANDOLPH, JR., AKA CLARENCE RANDOLPH, AKA BOBBY MOORE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

9th Cir. | 1972-04-10
No. 71-2873
456 F.2d 689 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1972) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this passing counterfeit currency case is affirmed.

We reject the challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. There are many scraps of evidence, each of which alone means little, put together they could mean a lot to a jury.

On the facts here, disbelief of Randolph’s testimony could lead to some affirmative inferences of knowledge.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw