RICHARD E. COFFEY AND MILDRED M. COFFEY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES; RICHARD E. COFFEY AND MILDRED M. COFFEY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, V. THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
RICHARD E. COFFEY AND MILDRED M. COFFEY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES; RICHARD E. COFFEY AND MILDRED M. COFFEY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, V. THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
455 F.2d 1380
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1972)
Caution
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The facts of the case may be found in the decision of the district court in Coffey v. United States (D.C.S.D.Cal., 1971) 324 F.Supp. 1087. It is clear that Coffey was acting incident to military service.
The order of the district court granting a motion for summary judgment in behalf of the United States, appellee, is affirmed on the authority of Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. 152 (1950).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Richard v. Henninger, 473 F.2d 814 (9th Cir. 1973)
-
Mills v. Tucker, 499 F.2d 866 (9th Cir. 1974)
-
Mason v. United States, 568 F.2d 1135 (5th Cir. 1978)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135 (U.S. 1950)