ANTHONY T. LEE ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR AND AMICUS CURIAE-APPELLEE,
v.
MACON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL., DEFENDANTS, OXFORD CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, CALHOUN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

5th Cir. | 1972-02-04
No. 71-2735
455 F.2d 978 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1972)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the lower court did not err in ordering the pairing of public schools based on the prior appellate decision's language.


Facts & Procedural History

Following a prior appellate decision, the district court ordered the pairing of public schools in Oxford and Calhoun County, Alabama. The City of Oxfo…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Following this school-desegregation case’s last appearance in this Court, Lee v. Macon County Board of Education, 5 Cir. 1971, 448 F. 2d 746, the district court, believing that it had no choice in the matter under our opinion, ordered the pairing of public schools in the City of Oxford and the County of Calhoun, Alabama. The City of Oxford Board of Education appeals from that order. The language of our previous decision in this case was open to the construction given it below, i. e., as mandating the pairing of the public schools in Oxford and the adjacent sections of Calhoun County. Clearly, we should decline to hold the lower court in error on this appeal.

Nevertheless, we believe it appropriate to remind the parties to this litigation that the court below, under this Court’s decision in United States v. Hinds County School Board, 5 Cir. 1970, 433 F. 2d 611, is required to retain jurisdiction for at least three years following the achievement of a unitary school system. During this period, the parties will be free to seek such modifications of the desegregation order as appear justified in the light of changed conditions, new insights into the educational problems confronting the public schools, or later developments in the jurisprudence.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw