UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
LEE TRAVIS ANDREWS, APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A conviction can be sustained by the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice if it is not inherently incredible or unsubstantial.
Appellant was convicted of stealing produce transported in interstate commerce. The conviction was based on the testimony of an accomplice, which the …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Accomplice Testimony cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
Andrews appeals his conviction for having stolen certain produce being transported in interstate commerce (18 U.S.C. § 659).
It is here maintained that the prosecution’s evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. Andrews was incriminated by the testimony of an accomplice, but he argues that his conviction should be vacated because this accusing testimony was not corroborated.
It is well settled in our Circuit that a conviction may properly rest on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice, if the testimony is not incredible or unsubstantial on its face. See, e. g., Darden v. United States, 405 F. 2d 1054 (9th Cir. 1969).1 Even were the rule to the contrary, our conclusion would not be altered. It was proved that Andrews made certain admissions, and these admissions were amply corroborative of the testimony of the accomplice.
Affirmed.
. Judge Ely notes, as he has done before, his hope that the court will one day reexamine its existing rule. He believes that the accusing testimony of an accomplice, especially one whom the Government may favor because of his testimony, is so inherently suspect that its corroboration should be required.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Turner, 528 F.2d 143 (9th Cir. 1975)
-
United States v. Hibler, 463 F.2d 455 (9th Cir. 1972)
-
United States v. Sidman, 470 F.2d 1158 (9th Cir. 1972)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Darden v. United States, 405 F.2d 1054 (9th Cir. 1969)