ROBERT W. O'CONNELL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
ROBERT W. O'CONNELL, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
455 F.2d 521
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1972)
Topics
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Failure To File Brief cases and more on FLexlaw
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F. 2d 981.
The judgment below is affirmed.1 See Local Rule 21.
. In his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, appellant has alleged that his guilty plea was coerced by the eleven-month delay between his indictment and his arraignment, and consequently was denied the opportunity of having his federal sen-fence run concurrently with a state sentence imposed prior to his indictment.
. See N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Clothing-Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F. 2d 966.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers OF Am., AFL-CIO, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Kimbrough v. Beto, 412 F.2d 981 (5th Cir. 1969)