DAVID ROGER LETTSOME, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
DAVID ROGER LETTSOME, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
453 F.2d 395
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
This appeal represents the third review of the case by this court,1 and the facts are set out in detail in the previous opinions of this court. The findings of the trial court on this appeal, not being clearly erroneous, are hereby affirmed.2
Affirmed.
. Lettsome v. United States, 5 Cir., 411 F. 2d 917; Lettsome v. United States, 5 Cir., 434 F. 2d 907.
. Union Oil Company of Cal. v. Tug Mary Malloy, 5 Cir. 1969, 414 F. 2d 669.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McDONALD v. Patton-Tully Transp. Co. & the M/V Kate Tully, 590 F.2d 126 (5th Cir. 1979)
Authorities Cited
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Lettsome v. United States, 434 F.2d 907 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Lettsome v. The United States, 411 F.2d 917 (5th Cir. 1969)
- Union OIL Co. OF Cal. v. The TUG Mary Malloy, 414 F.2d 669 (5th Cir. 1969)