IN THE MATTER OF AVAL CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, DEBTOR. WILLIAM SAT, JR., CLAIMANT AND APPELLANT,
v.
A. J. BUMB, TRUSTEE, RESPONDENT AND APPELLEE

9th Cir. | 1971-11-09
No. 25910
451 F.2d 1346 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1971)
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

The district court order sustaining on review the referee’s denial of Sat’s claim for services rendered the bankrupt is affirmed.

We sustain the order on the basis that Sat necessarily was acting as a broker without a license as required by the California Business and Professions Code. See Section 10136 of the California Business and Professions Code. The fact that he had only one customer does not seem to exempt him. There being no transcript of the hearing before the referee, we cannot go behind his findings upon which he based his conclusions.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw