ANDREW ROBERT BANKS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF DADE COUNTY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
ANDREW ROBERT BANKS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF DADE COUNTY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
450 F.2d 1103
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 24 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1
. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 430 F. 2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970).
This case originated as a three-judge case, Banks v. Board of Public Instruction of Dade County, 314 F.Supp. 285 (S.D.Fla.1970) and was reversed and remanded for a fresh decree by the Supreme Court, 401 U.S. 988, 91 S.Ct. 1223, 28 L.Ed.2d 526 (1971). Upon remand the single district judge entered the order here appealed adopting as his findings of fact and conclusions of law that portion of the opinion of the three-judge court concerning the Frist Amendment challenge to Board Regulation 6122. j
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Jannine Walter v. Sch. Bd. OF Indian River Cnty., 518 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
-
Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (U.S. 1975)
-
Holloman v. Harland, 370 F.3d 1252 (11th Cir. 2004)
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers OF Am., AFL-CIO, 430 F.2d 966 (5th Cir. 1970)
- ABC Books, Inc. v. Benson, 401 U.S. 988 (U.S. 1971)