SHAN SAYLES AND ALIX COOPERMAN, CO-PARTNERS, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF PARIS THEATER-PHOENIX, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,
v.
MILTON GRAHAM, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS MAYOR OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Federal courts should not interfere with state criminal prosecutions absent extraordinary circumstances, even if films were seized without a prior adversary hearing.
Appellees' allegedly obscene films were seized by police without a prior adversary hearing, leading to state obscenity charges. Appellees brought a ci…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Obscenity Law cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
On several occasions the police seized allegedly obscene films from appellees without a prior adversary hearing to determine whether the films were protected by the First Amendment. Appellees were charged with willfully showing obscene films in violation of the Arizona obscenity statute. They then brought this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
The district court ordered the return of the films, effectively halting the pending state prosecutions, and granted a preliminary injunction against any such seizures in the future. The conclusions of the district court that such seizures were unconstitutional and that the films must be returned were in accord with our subsequent decision in Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F. 2d 643 (9th Cir. 1970).
However, the Supreme Court has since announced strictures against federal courts interfering with the good faith enforcement of state criminal laws. Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971), and companion cases, including Perez v. Ledesma, 401 U.S. 82, 91 S.Ct. 674, 27 L.Ed.2d 701 (1971).
Demich has been remanded to us for reconsideration in light of Perez. Ferdon v. Demich, Inc., 401 U.S. 990, 91 S.Ct. 1223, 28 L.Ed.2d 528 (1971). We in turn have remanded Demich to the district court to allow that court the opportunity for reconsideration in the first instance. Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 443 F. 2d 1359 (9th Cir. 1971).
We have also remanded Nissinoff v. Jensen (9th Cir.) 447 F. 2d 1404, in which the district court ordered the return of allegedly obscene films seized without a prior adversary hearing, enjoined the use of those films in any criminal prosecution, and enjoined any such seizures in the future.
In our judgment the same course should be followed here.
Remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (U.S. 1971)
- Perez v. Ledesma, 401 U.S. 82 (U.S. 1971)
- Demich, Inc. v. Ferdon, 426 F.2d 643 (9th Cir. 1970)
- Gregory v. Tarr, 401 U.S. 990 (U.S. 1971)
- Rev. Robert Hunter v. Allen, 443 F.2d 1359 (5th Cir. 1971)
- Ferdon v. Demich, Inc., 401 U.S. 990 (U.S. 1971)
- Nissinoff v. Jensen, 447 F.2d 1404 (9th Cir. 1971)
- Clement v. Laird, 447 F.2d 1404 (9th Cir. 1971)