UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
ROBERT SAMUEL LUMSDEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
ROBERT SAMUEL LUMSDEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
449 F.2d 154
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Congress has the power to conscript, United States v. O’Brien, 1968, 391 U.S. 367, 377, 88 S.Ct. 1673, 20 L.Ed. 2d 672; conscription does not constitute involuntary servitude, Arver v. United States, 1918, 245 U.S. 366, 38 S.Ct. 159, 62 L.Ed. 349; United States v. Gidmark, 9 Cir., 1971, 440 F. 2d 773, nor does it violate due process, United States v. Butler, 6 Cir., 1968, 389 F. 2d 172.
Affirmed. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Ross, 468 F.2d 1213 (9th Cir. 1972)
Authorities Cited
- United States v. O'Brien, 391 U.S. 367 (U.S. 1968)
- Selective Draft Law Cases, 245 U.S. 366 (U.S. 1918)
- United States v. Butler, 389 F.2d 172 (6th Cir. 1968)
- United States v. Gidmark, 440 F.2d 773 (9th Cir. 1971)