MAGIC CHEF, INC., PETITIONER,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT

6th Cir. | 1971-06-28
Nos. 20454, 20455
443 F.2d 374 United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1971)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the National Labor Relations Board's orders requiring the company to rehire employees and grant back pay were supported by substantial evidence and would be enforced.


Facts & Procedural History

The company discharged three employees, claiming they violated a no solicitation rule. The National Labor Relations Board found the discharges were pr…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

These cases involve two petitions for review and cross-applications for enforcement of orders of the National Labor Relations Board. They have been consolidated for hearing and decision.

The orders required the company to rehire and grant back pay to three employees whom the Board found to be discharged because of union activities, in violation of § 8(a) (1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (1) and (3) (1964).

The discharges were justified by company officials on the ground that each of the men had violated a general no solicitation rule by soliciting union memberships.

From the evidence given before the Hearing Examiner and from the fact that each man had a prior good work record before the discharge, the Board inferred that the discharges were pretextual.

On review of the evidentiary record, we find substantial support for the findings of the Board.

Additionally, in Case No. 20,454, petitioner contends that the union had not filed timely exceptions to the Trial Examiner’s decision. On review of the record, we find no merit to this contention.

The orders of the National Labor Relations Board will be enforced.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw