SIDNEY B. COHEN, A/K/A ARTHUR NORMAN SMITH, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

5th Cir. | 1971-01-05
No. 30242
436 F.2d 586 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1971) Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the indictment was not defective for lack of evidence before the grand jury, and the defendant's claims of an involuntary plea and ineffective counsel were without merit.


Facts & Procedural History

Cohen was convicted upon a nolo contendere plea for interstate transportation of a counterfeit check. He later moved to vacate his sentence, arguing t…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Sidney B. Cohen appeals from the District Court’s denial of his motion to vacate judgment and sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We affirm.

Cohen was convicted upon his plea of nolo contendere on one count of causing the interstate transportation of a counterfeit American Express traveler’s check, knowing the same to be counterfeit, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2314. Four similar counts, and one count alleging a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, were dismissed upon motion of the Government. There was no direct appeal.

Cohen contends that, inasmuch as the record does not indicate that the grand jury which indicted him was shown any evidence that he himself caused the counterfeit traveler’s cheek to be transported interstate, the indictment was so defective as to deprive the District Court of jurisdiction. The argument is without merit. Indictments are not open to challenge merely on the ground that the evidence before the grand jury was inadequate or incompetent. Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359, 363, 76 S.Ct. 406, 408, 100 L.Ed. 397 (1956).

Cohen further contends that his plea of nolo contendere was involuntary, and that the assistance rendered him by counsel was ineffective. The District Judge examined the transcript of the original proceeding and concluded, without an evidentiary hearing, that there was no substance to Cohen’s allegations. We agree that the records of the case conclusively show that Cohen is entitled to no relief. 28 U.S.C. § 2255; Barrett v. United States, 5 Cir., 1962, 302 F. 2d 151.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw