IN THE MATTER OF JOHN PETER QUILICI, BANKRUPT. EDWARD M. WALSH, APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN PETER QUILICI, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a deposit in a state savings and loan association that issues stock is not exempt under California law, as the exemption for shares only applies when the association issues neither stock nor investment certificates.
A bankrupt claimed a $1,000 deposit in a California state savings and loan association as exempt property. The association issued stock, and the refer…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM:
The bankrupt in this action claimed as exempt property, a deposit of $1,000 in a savings and loan association organized under California law. The trustee refused to allow the exemption. The referee allowed the exemption. The district court, on review, affirmed the order of the referee. We reverse.
Under the Bankruptcy Act, exemptions are governed by state law, 11 U.S.C. § 624. § 690.21 of the California Code of Civil Procedure provides that shares of stock in any building and loan association are exempt to the extent of $1,000. § 7611 Calif. Financial Code, provides that the shares of associations, issuing neither stock nor investment certificates, are exempt up to the sum of $1,000. The referee specifically found that the association issued stock.
A sharp distinction exists between the shares of an association and its stock, In re Pacific Coast Bldg, and Loan Ass’n, 15 Cal.2d 134, 142, 99 P. 2d 251 (1940). “Stock”, is defined as “guarantee stock”, Calif. Fin. Code § 5068. “Shares”, are defined as “withdrawable shares constituting * * * membership shares”, Calif. Fin. Code § 5067.
Judge Byrne’s decision, In the Matter of Mulkins and Crawford Electric Co., (D.C.S.D.Cal.1956) 145 F.Supp. 146, squarely decided the issue we confront. There the state savings and loan association issued stock and also issued to the bankrupt a certificate for money deposited. Judge Byrne concluded that the shares did not come within § 690.21 of the California Code of Civil Procedure (which refers to stock) and did not come within the exception as to shares under § 7611 of the Calif. Financial Code. The opinion in Love v. Menick, (9 Cir. 1965) 341 F. 2d 680, written by Judge Ely, is not contrary. There the money was deposited with a federal savings and loan association. § 11000 of the Calif. Financial Code provides that the holders of shares or shares accounts in federal savings and loan associations shall have the same exemption as granted in connection with state savings and loan associations. The referee declared the deposit not exempt, the district court affirmed the referee, and the circuit reversed.
Love v. Menick, supra, cited § 7611 of the Calif. Financial Code. It did not discuss the provision therein that shares in state savings and loan associations are exempt only when the association issues neither stock nor investment certificates. “A federal building and loan association, * * * issues no stock of any kind, guarantee or otherwise.” Contract Liquidator Corp. v. Blunt, 190 Cal.App.2d Supp. 875, 12 Cal.Rptr. 254 (App.Dept. L.A. Superior Ct.). Therefore under § 7611, Calif. Financial Code, the shares in the federal savings and loan association in Love v. Menick, were exempt.
The decision in Mulkins and Crawford Electric Co., supra, and in Love v. Menick, supra, are not inconsistent.
The judgment is reversed and remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this decision.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- In re Love v. A. S. Menick in Bankruptcy for the Estate of Edward F. Love, 341 F.2d 680 (9th Cir. 1965)