UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. JACK JAMES, RELATOR-APPELLANT,
v.
HAROLD W. FOLLETTE, AS WARDEN OF GREEN HAVEN PRISON, AT STORMVILLE, NEW YORK, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE

2d Cir. | 1970-09-21
Nos. 688, Docket 33894
431 F.2d 708 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court affirmed the denial of the habeas corpus writ, finding no need for an evidentiary hearing.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant sought a writ of habeas corpus after his state conviction. The district court denied the application without a hearing.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Jack James appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denying without a hearing his application for a writ of habeas corpus. We affirmed on the well-reasoned opinion of Judge Weinfeld, reported at 301 F.Supp. 569 (S.D.N.Y.1969).

While the District Court erroneously relied on 28 U.S.C. § 2244(a), which relates to federal detention and not to state prisoners, in support of its decision not to hold a hearing, this miscitation hardly warrants a reversal. The ruling was correct. The entire trial transcript, Judge Palmieri’s two prior opinions, and the Skobel report were thoroughly reviewed by Judge Weinfeld. 301 F.Supp. at 571. These documents provided an undisputed factual record sufficiently adequate to enable Judge Weinfeld to make an independent appraisal of appellant’s constitutional claims. Therefore there was no need for an evidentiary hearing. Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 312-313, 83 S.Ct. 745, 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1963); United States ex rel. Mason v Murphy, 351 F. 2d 610, 611 (2 Cir. 1965) (per curiam).

We are grateful to George J. Grum-bach, Jr., Esq., assigned counsel in this case, for his able presentation on appellant’s behalf.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw