UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
JOHN L. BATTAGLIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
JOHN L. BATTAGLIA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
426 F.2d 894
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1970)
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Battaglia appeals from an order revoking probation. In essence, his argument is that the evidence of his violation of the. terms of his probation is so slight that we should hold that the trial judge abused his discretion. See Whitfield v. United States, 9 Cir., 1968, 401 F. 2d 480, 482; Longknife v. United States, 9 Cir., 1967, 381 F. 2d 17, 19. On this record, we cannot so hold. There is substantial evidence of repeated and' serious violations of the terms of Battaglia’s probation.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Gasca-Kraft, 522 F.2d 149 (9th Cir. 1975)
-
Marcelino Martin-Mendoza v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 499 F.2d 918 (9th Cir. 1974)
-
de Lara v. United States, 439 F.2d 1316 (5th Cir. 1971)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Longknife v. United States, 381 F.2d 17 (9th Cir. 1967)
- Whitfield v. United States, 401 F.2d 480 (9th Cir. 1968)