DONALD C. WILSON, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

3d Cir. | 1970-05-13
No. 18215
Before GANEY, VAN DUSEN and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.
426 F.2d 246 United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the statutes under which the petitioner was convicted are constitutional, rejecting claims of self-incrimination and revenue measure challenges.


Facts & Procedural History

Petitioner pleaded guilty to violating federal statutes prohibiting the distribution of heroin without original tax stamps or written order forms. He …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner pleaded guilty to charges of violation of 26 U.S.C. § 4704(a) (1964), which forbids purchasing, selling, dispensing or distributing heroin not in or from the original tax-stamped packages, and of 26 U.S.C. § 4705(a) (1964), which forbids selling, bartering, exchanging or giving heroin except pursuant to a written order on a form issued by the Secretary of the Treasury. He was sentenced on October 24, 1967.

Thereafter, petitioner filed a motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1964), to vacate those sentences because they were imposed under unconstitutional statutes. He relied on the fact that there was no means whereby to obtain either the required tax stamp, § 4704(a), or the required order form, § 4705(a). In the district court he contended that the statutes violated his privilege against self-incrimination. The district court denied relief and this appeal followed. In this court he has added the contention that the statutes are not truly revenue measures and, hence, are unconstitutional.

We have considered and reject both contentions. The controlling cases are Turner v. United States, 396 U.S. 398, 90 S.Ct. 642, 24 L.Ed.2d 610 (1970); Minor v. United States, 396 U.S. 87, 90 S.Ct. 284, 24 L.Ed.2d 283 (1969); and United States v. Clark, 425 F. 2d 827 (3 Cir., 1970). The order of the district court will be affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw