FRED J. MINNITI, APPELLANT,
v.
RUTH GWEN MINNITI, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Lump Sum Alimony cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We are unable to hold that the award of the husband’s interest in the marital home to the wife as lump sum alimony constituted an abuse of discretion and therefore affirm that aspect of the judgment under review. Conner v. Conner, 439 So. 2d 887 (Fla.1983); Lopez v. Lopez, 438 So. 2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Rosen v. Rosen, 386 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), rev. denied, 392 So. 2d 1378 (Fla.1981); Hague v. Hague, 382 So. 2d 852 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). The wife has conceded error in the amounts of child support and the cause is consequently remanded for redetermination of that issue. Upon remand, the trial court will also be free to spell out any required details of the general terms of the “shared custody” provision of the final judgment.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nestor F. Manrique v. Manrique, 786 So. 2d 1270 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…see Bible v. Bible, 597 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), and Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So. 2d 203 (Fla.1983), we cannot say that the trial court abused its discretion on this record. See Lopez v. Lopez, 438 So. 2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Minniti v. Minniti, 445 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). The wife in this ease speaks little English. For ten years of the marriage she did not work outside of the home. Her earning ability is limited. The court imputed her net income at $825.92 per month. The couple’s two minor chil…
Authorities Cited
- Doyle Edward Conner v. Conner, 439 So. 2d 887 (Fla. 1983)
- Rosen v. Rosen, 386 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
- Lopez v. Addys Lopez, 438 So. 2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
- Hague v. Hague, 382 So. 2d 852 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)