JACK MARTINEZ ET AL., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANTS,
v.
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
JACK MARTINEZ ET AL., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANTS,
PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
424 F.2d 547
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Martinez and others are plaintiffs below and appeal from a judgment dismissing their action on the ground that there is no liability. The district judge, the Honorable Ray McNichols, wrote a careful and detailed opinion in the case which is reported at 283 F.Supp. 514 (1968). As to count one of the complaint, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district judge at 283 F.Supp. pp. 523-533. As to count two of the complaint, we affirm for the reason stated by the district judge under the heading “Issue of Law No. 10 states: ” at 283 F.Supp. pp. 521-523. We express no opinion as to the correctness of his decision under issues 8 and 9, discussed at 283 F.Supp. pp. 518-521.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nat'l Automatic Laundry & Cleaning Council v. Shultz, 443 F.2d 689 (D.C. Cir. 1971)
-
Beanland v. Chicago, 480 F.2d 109 (8th Cir. 1973)
-
Williams v. Fenix & Scisson, Inc., 608 F.2d 1205 (9th Cir. 1979)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence