ERNEST STERLING HODGE, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS FATHER, RUSSELL S. HODGE AS NEXT FRIEND, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE; RUSSELL S. HODGE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
ERNEST STERLING HODGE, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS FATHER, RUSSELL S. HODGE AS NEXT FRIEND, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE; RUSSELL S. HODGE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
424 F.2d 545
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the relevant facts and the applicable law, we hereby affirm and adopt the exhaustive opinion of Judge W. A. Bootle of the District Court in 310 F.Supp. 1090, hold ing that the United States is not liable in this claim for damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act for the injuries suffered by appellant Ernest S. Hodge.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Horn v. C. L. Osborn Contracting Co., 591 F.2d 318 (5th Cir. 1979)
-
Tisdale v. United States, 62 F.3d 1367 (11th Cir. 1995)
-
Baum v. United States, 427 F.2d 215 (5th Cir. 1970)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence