JOYCE MARIE MOORE ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,
v.
TANGIPAHOA PARISH SCHOOL BOARD ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, JOSEPH DURHAM, A MINOR, BY MAX DURHAM, JR., HIS FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND, ET AL., INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS
JOYCE MARIE MOORE ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,
TANGIPAHOA PARISH SCHOOL BOARD ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, JOSEPH DURHAM, A MINOR, BY MAX DURHAM, JR., HIS FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND, ET AL., INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS
421 F.2d 1407
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
In this school desegregation case the school board appellant has moved to dismiss the appeal. The private intervenorappellants have joined in this motion. The private plaintiffs also join stating their belief that the District Court’s order has established a unitary school system. On these motions and without passing on whether the plan implemented by the District Court does in fact meet the requirements of Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, 1969, 396 U.S. 19, 90 S.Ct. 29, 24 L.Ed.2d 19 and Singleton v. Jackson Municipal Separate School District (and consolidated cases en banc), 419 F. 2d 1211 [December 1, 1969] we grant the motion to dismiss the appeal.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shellman v. United States Lines, Inc., 528 F.2d 675 (9th Cir. 1975)
-
United States v. Hinds Cnty. Sch. Bd., 560 F.2d 619 (5th Cir. 1977)
-
Brookhaven Landscape & Grading Co., Inc. v. J. F. Barton Contracting Co. & United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 681 F.2d 734 (11th Cir. 1982)
Authorities Cited
- Alexander v. Holmes Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 396 U.S. 19 (U.S. 1969)
- Singleton v. Jackson Mun. Separate Sch. Dist., 419 F.2d 1211 (5th Cir. 1969)