NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER
v.
FLOWERS BAKING COMPANY, INC., AND IDEAL BAKING COMPANY, INC., RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the National Labor Relations Board's order was supported by substantial evidence and would be enforced.
The Board sought to enforce its order against Respondents following a union's certification as bargaining representative. The issues involved alleged …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Unilateral Wage Increases cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
This case comes to the court on the application of the Board to enforce its order of February 12, 1968 against Respondents. 169 NLRB No. 101.
The union1 was certified as bargaining representative of Respondents’ employees on August 2, 1966 after an election. The issues presented and decided adversely to Respondents involve preelection § 8(a) (1) violations, post-election § 8(a) (3) violations, and refusal to bargain charges in violation of § 8(a) (5) of the Act. 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (1), (3) and (5). The § 8(a) (3) charges include the laying off of employee Pitts, and the refusal to reinstate unfair practice strikers. The refusal to bargain charges include the unilateral wage increase, the unilateral reduction of hours of employment of certain employees, and also the general refusal to bargain after the strike commenced.
The order of the Board in all respects is amply supported by substantial evidence considered on the record as a whole. The order will be enforced.
Enforced.
. American Bakery and Confectionery Workers International Union, AFL-CIO.