METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY AND CHRISTOPHER HOWARD, APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF OPA LOCKA AND MORRISON ASSURANCE COMPANY, INC., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1984-01-31
Nos. 83-1471, 83-1685
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and HUBBART, JJ.
444 So. 2d 570 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1984) Caution
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. F & R Builders v. Lowell Dunn Company, 364 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Inman v. Club on Sailboat Key, Inc., 342 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Schonfield v. City of Coral Gables, 174 So. 2d 453 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Cooper v. State, 453 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
    …. 2d at 954. See also Duke v. State, 444 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1984). The Third District agrees with Ru-saw with respect to the appropriate sentence under Section 794.011(2). State v. Jimenez, 445 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1983); State v. Mendoza, 444 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1984). There being no error in the state’s reliance upon an information as the appropriate charging document and in the use of a [*69] 6-member jury, the judgment is AFFIRMED. We certify the following as a question of great public im…
  • Leduc v. State, 448 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
    …dless of the elimination of the death penalty for that crime. See Buford v. State; Donaldson v. Sack, 265 So. 2d 499 (Fla.1972); Duke v. State, 444 So. 2d 492 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); State v. Jimenez, 443 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); State v. Mendoza, 444 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). But see, Hogan v. State, 427 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. We certify, however, to the Supreme Court of Florida the following as questions of great public importance,…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw