UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
PAUL A. CLOSKEY, APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the conviction for larceny after bailment was proper, as it does not require a trespassory taking.
The defendant was indicted under the Federal Assimilative Crimes Act for violating a Virginia statute by failing to return a bailed vehicle. He was co…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM:
Paul A. Closkey, appellant, was indicted pursuant to the Federal Assimilative Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 13, for willfully and knowingly failing, after coming into possession of a motor vehicle as a bailee,1 to return the vehicle in accordance with the bailment agreement in violation of Va.Code § 18.1-163. Closkey was found guilty by the judge without a jury and sentenced to a term of imprisonment.
Upon appeal Closkey claims (1) that he was improperly convicted of the crime of larceny in that it was not alleged or proven that the original taking of the vehicle was trespassory and (2) that there was otherwise insufficient evidence as a matter of law to support his conviction.
Closkey’s claims are without merit. He was not indicted and tried for the common-law offense of larceny, but rather for the statutory crime of “larceny after bailment,”2 which does not require a trespassory taking of the personal property of another. The record amply supports the judgment below.
Affirmed.
. Closkey’s possession of the motor vehicle involved was acquired through a bailment agreement with the Hertz Corporation at the Washington National Airport, an area within federal jurisdiction.
. Va.Code, § 18.1-163. Failure to return such animal, aircraft, vehicle or boat. — If any person comes into the possession as bailee of any animal, aircraft, vehicle, boat or vessel, and fails to return the same to the bailor, in accordance with the bailment agreement, he shall be deemed guilty of larceny thereof and receive the same punishment, according to the value of the thing stolen, prescribed for the punishment of the larceny of goods and chattels.' The failure to return to the bailor such animal, aircraft, vehicle, boat or vessel, within five days from the time the bailee has agreed in writing to return the same shall be prima facie evidence of larceny by such bailee of such animal, aircraft, vehicle, boat or vessel. (Code 1950, § 18-220; 1960, c. 358).