UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
JAMES ALFRED HILLS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
JAMES ALFRED HILLS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
409 F.2d 827
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 28 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
James Alfred Hills was convicted of the offense of theft of parcel post packages from a United States Post Office in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1708. At Hills’ behest we have carefully examined the record of his trial.1 We have found neither evidentiary nor procedural irregularity, and we have found that there is substantial evidence in the record to support his conviction.
Affirmed.
. Under Rule 18 the Court has placed this case on the Summary Calendar for disposition without oral argument. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F. 2d 804, Part I.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
Nestor v. Hershey, 425 F.2d 504 (D.C. Cir. 1969)
-
Wright v. Ingold, 445 F.2d 109 (7th Cir. 1971)
-
Marsano v. Hon. Melvin Laird, 412 F.2d 65 (2d Cir. 1969)
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Murphy v. Houma Well Serv., 409 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1969)