ALBERT ARCINIAGA, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM: The judgment of conviction is affirmed. This was a border crossing case with a rubber contraption containing narcotics which defendant had swallowed, lodging in the stomach. The package was retrieved by causing an emetic to be given to Arciniaga. We have had a number of alimentary canal cases involving narcotics. Some of them are: Blackford v. United States, 9 Cir., 247 F. 2d 745, cert. denied 356 U.S. 914, 78 S.Ct. 672, 2 L.Ed.2d 586. Blefare v. United States, 9 Cir., 362 F. 2d 870. Rivas v. United States, 9 Cir., 368 F. 2d 703. Henderson v. United States, 9 Cir., 390 F. 2d 805. Huguez v. United States, 9 Cir., 406 F. 2d 366, decided Sept. 30, 1968. We find this one closest to Rivas. Other points asserted we find without merit.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thompson v. United States, 411 F.2d 946 (9th Cir. 1969)
Authorities Cited
- Henderson v. United States, 390 F.2d 805 (9th Cir. 1967)
- Blackford v. United States, 247 F.2d 745 (9th Cir. 1957)
- Moises Rivas v. United States, 368 F.2d 703 (9th Cir. 1966)
- Huguez v. United States, 406 F.2d 366 (9th Cir. 1968)
- Sykes v. Chairman & Members of the Dist. of Columbia Parole Bd., 356 U.S. 914 (U.S. 1958)
- Galloway v. Illinois, 356 U.S. 914 (U.S. 1958)
- Blefare v. United States, 362 F.2d 870 (9th Cir. 1966)