THE EXCHANGE NATIONAL BANK OF ATCHISON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THE HIBERNIA NATIONAL BANK OF NEW ORLEANS, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A bank is not liable for a personal loan made by another bank to its officer, even if the bank knew of the officer's misconduct and retained him in employment.
Plaintiff bank loaned money to an officer of defendant bank. The officer defaulted on the loan. Plaintiff alleged defendant bank knew of the officer's…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Implied Warranty cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
The Exchange National Bank of Atchison, in the State of Kansas, sued the Hibernia National Bank of New Orleans for $50,000, plus Attorney’s fees and costs. The District Court granted a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief could be granted, and we affirm.
An officer of Hibernia obtained a personal loan of $70,000 from Exchange. Twenty thousand was repaid but there was default as to' the remainder. Plaintiff alleged that in 1961, 1962, and 1963' the officer had engaged in illegal bank ing activities which were brought to the attention of the defendant. He, nevertheless, was allowed to remain with Hibernia until December, 1963. Thus, said the plaintiff, the defendant, by continuing the employment, held the official out to be a person of honesty and integrity, relied upon in making the loan. It is asserted, therefore, that Hibernia is obligated to pay the debt.
It is to be noted that Exchange was not a customer or depositor of Hibernia. There is no allegation that the defendant was consulted about the loan or had any knowledge of it. Thus, it is obvious that plaintiff made the loan at its sole discretion. The loan was personal and the defendant was in no way a party to it.
Under these circumstances, we are compelled to agree with the District Court that there is no possible legal basis upon which Hibernia might be held liable. By retaining the officer in its employ the bank did not represent or warrant to the appellant or anyone else that he could or would pay his personal debts, or that, upon default the bank would pay for him.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Murphy v. Houma Well Serv., 409 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1969)
Authorities Cited
- Gamez v. Beto, 406 F.2d 1000 (5th Cir. 1969)