VICENTE GATICA STARTTI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
DR. GEORGE J. BETO, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Federal courts will not interfere with state prison discipline unless exceptional circumstances are present.
A Texas prisoner was placed in solitary confinement on a bread and water diet for nine days for acting as a lookout. He sued prison authorities under …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prison Discipline cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing the petition of a Texas convict as being without merit.
Appellant, a prisoner in a Texas penitentiary, was caught acting as a lookout for a poker game among prisoners. As punishment, he was put in solitary confinement on the diet of bread and water for a period of nine (9) days. Appellant seeks mandamus to order the respondent prison authorities to cease and desist from cruel and unusual punishment with which he is still being threatened, and for damages in the sum of $10,000 as remuneration for the inequities he suffered while in solitary. Appellant filed his suit on the basis of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
The district court dismissed the petition on grounds that it dealt with matters of prison discipline which are the sole concern of the state unless exceptional circumstances are present, and that the petition stated no cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We concur. It is settled that federal courts will not interfere with matters of discipline and control in state prisons. United States ex rel. Lee v. Illinois, 7 Cir. 1965, 343 F. 2d 120; United States ex rel. Knight v. Ragen, 7 Cir. 1964, 337 F. 2d 425, cert. denied 380 U.S. 985, 85 S.Ct. 1355, 14 L.Ed.2d 277; Tabor v. Hardwick, 5 Cir. 1955, 224 F. 2d 526, cert. denied 350 U.S. 971, 76 S.Ct. 445, 100 L.Ed. 843. The petitioner’s complaint does not rise to the constitutional level but deals with matters of prison discipline solely the concern of the state.
The judgment of the district court dismissing the petition is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hess v. Olin G. Blackwell, 409 F.2d 362 (5th Cir. 1969)
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Ragen, 337 F.2d 425 (7th Cir. 1964)
- Tabor v. Hardwick, 224 F.2d 526 (5th Cir. 1955)
- Dow v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp., 350 U.S. 971 (U.S. 1956)
- United States ex rel. Robert M. LEE, Jr. v. People OF the State OF Ill., 343 F.2d 120 (7th Cir. 1965)
- Lemons v. United States, 380 U.S. 985 (U.S. 1965)
- Knight v. Ragen, 380 U.S. 985 (U.S. 1965)
- McGlone v. United States, 350 U.S. 971 (U.S. 1956)