LOUIS WECHSLER, APPELLANT,
v.
BEALL & ASSOCIATES ROOFING CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND KENT INSURANCE COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLEES
LOUIS WECHSLER, APPELLANT,
BEALL & ASSOCIATES ROOFING CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND KENT INSURANCE COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLEES
442 So. 2d 1104
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1983)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We grant the appellees’ motion for rehearing and withdraw our opinion filed November 8, 1983, and substitute the following:
We affirm the judgment for Kent Insurance Company which determined that Kent’s policy of insurance issued to Beall & Associates Roofing Corporation excluded coverage for the replacement and repair of appellant’s roof. Although such policy of insurance did not exclude coverage for other property damage caused by Beall’s negligence, for example, damages to the walls and interior of appellant’s home, furnishings and objects therein, see La Marche v. Shelby Mutual Insurance Co., 390 So. 2d 325 (Fla.1980), the appellant withdrew from the jury’s consideration his claim for such damages.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Robinson v. State, 458 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)…opportunity to respond to the reasons stated for retention. Stafford v. State, 440 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) and Thornton v. State, (Fla. 4th DCA, Case No. 82-1208, opinion filed April 13, 1983) [8 F.L.W. 1043], rev’d on other grounds on reh'g, 442 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). It is apparent that a defendant can make no appropriate response to a broad reference to his criminal history without more specific details. Another purpose of the statute is to permit a successor judge, at such time as release…
-
Art Crawford, Jr. v. State, 473 So. 2d 700 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)…y affected the substantial rights of the appellant. It shall not be presumed that error injuriously affected the substantial rights of the appellant. Also, hopefully, the Supreme Court will render moot this court’s observation in Thornton v. State, 442 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), that Florida’s standard is stricter than the federal standard. The people of Florida have tied their Fourth Amendment rights, by constitutional amendment, to interpretations thereof by this country’s highest court. Without comme…
-
Travieso v. State, 480 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)…witness and the question called for a negative answer; it did not invite the response as made. The cases are legion condemning such testimony as reversible error. It should suffice to cite our most recent utterance on the subject, Thornton v. State, 442 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). In his second point, Travieso contends the trial court erred in finding that Travieso did not have standing to contest the search and seizure conducted at his office in West Palm Beach. Travieso filed a motion to suppress the…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- LaMARCHE v. The Shelby Mut. Ins. Co. & Clearwater Prestige Homes, Inc., 390 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 1980)