WILLIE POWELL, APPELLANT,
v.
LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

5th Cir. | 1968-11-13
No. 26156
403 F.2d 33 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1968)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that no prejudicial error was made to appear regarding the appellant's contentions.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant, previously convicted of rape and paroled, was tried for a second rape and acquitted. His parole was subsequently revoked for an alleged ass…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

The appellant, Willie Powell, in proceedings in no way attacked here, was convicted by a Florida court in 1949 of rape, and was sentenced to life imprisonment. He was paroled in April, 1966, by the Florida Probation and Parole Commission. While on parole he was indicted and tried for another alleged rape, occurring February 1, 1967. He was acquitted by the jury at a trial for this offense, concluded April 7, 1967.

A parole violator’s warrant was issued for him on February 2, 1967, with hearing thereon held June 19, 1967, after the conclusion of the rape trial. His parole was revoked as a result of that hearing, not for the rape offense, but for the alleged assault and beating of one Byron Lucia, the boyfriend of the alleged rape victim.1 This assault, if it occurred at all, occurred as a part of the circumstances surrounding the alleged rape.

We have considered the claims advanced to the district court and to this Court by the appellant including double jeopardy, violation of the appellant’s privilege against self-incrimination by the questioning of him by his parole officer at the time of arrest, and the denial of a due process hearing before the Florida Probation and Parole Commission. In this connection we have carefully studied the record before the district court. No prejudicial error is made to appear as to any of the contentions raised. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.

. The Florida Probation and Parole Commission’s findings of August 3, 1967 were that

“from the testimony given by Marianne Walker [the raped girl] in person before said Commission on June 19, 1967, that on February 1, 1967, in Palm Beach Comity, Florida, that the said Willie Powell did violate the terms and conditions of his parole by unlawfully and without provocation beating, bruising, wounding and ill-treating one Byron Lucia [the boyfriend].” [R. 49]


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw