GERALD W. GETTEL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1983-11-23
No. 82-2712
GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.
442 So. 2d 1011 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1983) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
LEHAN, Judge.

LEHAN, Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for multiple counts of unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. We affirm.

Defendant objects to being limited on the scope of recross examination of one witness and redirect examination of another witness. However, we do not find the limitation to have been prejudicial. The questions that defendant was prevented from asking would not have adduced competent, relevant evidence.

AFFIRMED.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Gettel v. State, 449 So. 2d 413 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
    …denial of defendant’s motion. Defendant was convicted of twenty-eight counts of delivery of a controlled substance in violation of section 893.13, Florida Statutes (1981). Defendant’s conviction and sentencing were affirmed by this court on appeal. 442 So. 2d 1011 (Fla.App.1983). Thereafter defendant filed the motion for post-conviction relief. After an evidentiary hearing on defendant’s allegations, the trial court denied the requested relief. Defendant was a pharmacist who was convicted for allegedly filli…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw