CLYDE F. LEE, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
CLYDE F. LEE, APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
398 F.2d 834
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1968)
Caution
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The issues presented on this appeal are controlled by the decisions of the Supreme Court in Grosso v. United States, 390 U.S. 62, 88 S.Ct. 709, 19 L.Ed.2d 906 (1968), and Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39, 88 S.Ct. 697, 19 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). In view of these decisions, without necessity of further comment, it is clear that the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken must be reversed. See Peters v. Rutledge, 5 Cir. 1968, 397 F. 2d 731 [June 6, 1968]; Seaglione v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 396 F. 2d 219; Vouras v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 393 F. 2d 936 [May 3, 1968]; Leonard v. United States (5 Cir. 1968) 392 F. 2d 586; Motley v. United States (5 Cir. 1968) 392 F. 2d 590; Boehm v. United States (5 Cir. 1968) 392 F. 2d 978; Sklaroff v. United States (5 Cir. 1968) 389 F. 2d 1004.
Reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Graves, 669 F.2d 964 (5th Cir. 1982)
-
United States v. Carlton Ellis Allison, 481 F.2d 468 (5th Cir. 1973)
-
United States v. Gregorio, 497 F.2d 1253 (4th Cir. 1974)
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited (12 total)
- Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39 (U.S. 1968)
- Grosso v. United States, 390 U.S. 62 (U.S. 1968)
- Peters v. Rutledge, 397 F.2d 731 (5th Cir. 1968)
- Vouras v. United States, 393 F.2d 936 (5th Cir. 1968)
- Boehm v. United States, 392 F.2d 978 (5th Cir. 1968)
- Sklaroff v. United States, 389 F.2d 1004 (5th Cir. 1968)
- Ditzler v. Olin G. Blackwell, 392 F.2d 586 (5th Cir. 1968)
- Cummings v. Lamont Smith, 396 F.2d 219 (5th Cir. 1968)
- Scaglione v. United States, 396 F.2d 219 (5th Cir. 1968)
- Leonard v. United States, 392 F.2d 586 (5th Cir. 1968)