DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
POTAMKIN DODGE, INC., CHRYSLER CREDIT CORPORATION, AND ABKO PROPERTIES, INC., F/K/A CHRYSLER REALTY CORPORATION, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida Department of Revenue failed to perfect a sales tax lien by not filing a warrant as required by statute, and therefore takes only a pro rata share of purchase money deposited in court registry as a general creditor.
A tax authority that fails to file a warrant to perfect a sales tax lien under Florida Statutes § 212.15(4) has no priority claim on funds and is treated as a general creditor entitled only to a pro rata share.
[1] A sales tax lien does not attach under Florida Statutes § 212.15 unless a warrant is filed for the taxes due, and failure to file a warrant prevents the tax authority fro…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Department of Revenue sought priority over purchase money deposited in the court registry in a transaction involving Potamkin Dodge, Chrysler Cred…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse General Creditor Status cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the decision of the trial court that the Department of Revenue is a general creditor and may take only a pro rata share of the purchase money deposited in the registry of the court.
Section 212.-15, Florida Statutes (1981), prescribes the method for obtaining a sales tax lien and states it is the duty of the state to do so when sales taxes are delinquent or otherwise in jeopardy. No lien attaches until a warrant is filed for the taxes due. § 212.-15(4), Fla.Stat. (1981); General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Tom Norton Motor Co., 366 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). The Department failed to follow this procedure and perfect its lien. Cf. Sun First National Bank of Orlando v. Miller, 397 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) (properly perfected tax lien takes priority over subsequently filed security interest).
Therefore, the Department has no prior claim on the funds deposited into the registry of the court.
Section 212.10, Florida Statutes (1981), does not create a lien by stating that it is the duty of the purchaser to withhold sufficient funds from the purchase money to pay delinquent sales taxes. Screens Unlimited, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance Co., 37 Fla.Supp. 175, 177 (Fla. Pinellas Cty.Ct. 1972). At this time, we need not reach the question whether depositing the purchase money into the registry of the court was a means of withholding these funds sufficient to discharge the purchaser’s personal liability for failure to withhold and we expressly decline to do so.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp. v. TOM Norton Motor Co., 366 So. 2d 131 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979)
- SUN First Nat'l Bank OF Orlando v. Miller, 397 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
- Screens Unlimited, Inc. v. AETNA Ins. Co., 37 Fla. Supp. 175 (Pinellas Cty. Cir. Ct. 1972)