NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
ANIMAL FOODS COMPANY OF TEXAS, INC., RESPONDENT
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
ANIMAL FOODS COMPANY OF TEXAS, INC., RESPONDENT
395 F.2d 744
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The National Labor Relations Board found that respondent, Animal Foods Company of Texas, Inc., violated §§ 8 (a) (1) and 8(a) (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, by coercive interrogation of certain employees and by an allegedly discriminatory discharge of an employee by the name of Peeler. The Board petitions for enforcement of its order. The findings of the Board are supported by the record, considered as a whole, Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); NLRB v. Camco, Inc., 5 Cir., 1965, 340 F. 2d 803, cert. denied 382 U.S. 926, 86 S.Ct. 313, 15 L.Ed.2d 339; NLRB v. Certain-Teed Products Corp., 5 Cir., 1968, 387 F. 2d 639 [January 12, 1968]; NLRB v. West Point Manufacturing Company, 5 Cir., 1957, 245 F. 2d 783.
Enforced.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Green v. AETNA Ins. Co., 397 F.2d 614 (5th Cir. 1968)
-
Mrs. Ernestine Smith Torrence v. Union Barge Line Corp., 408 F.2d 873 (5th Cir. 1969)
-
Amax Aluminum Extrusion Prods., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 421 F.2d 394 (5th Cir. 1970)
Authorities Cited
- Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 340 U.S. 474 (U.S. 1951)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Camco, 340 F.2d 803 (5th Cir. 1965)
- Oling v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, 382 U.S. 926 (U.S. 1965)
- Camco, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 382 U.S. 926 (U.S. 1965)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. W. Point Mfg. Co. (Lanett Mill), 245 F.2d 783 (5th Cir. 1957)
- Exum v. Dampskibbelskabet Torm, 387 F.2d 639 (5th Cir. 1967)
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Certain-Teed Prods. Corp., 387 F.2d 639 (5th Cir. 1968)