THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
GEORGE A. ROUTH, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Proof Of Rehabilitation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The respondent was suspended from the practice of law for three years and the reinstatement was conditioned upon respondent’s proving his rehabilitation and successfully completing all three parts of The Florida Bar examination. Florida Bar v. Routh, 414 So. 2d 1023 (Fla.1982).
Respondent has petitioned for reinstatement and the referee has recommended that his petition be granted. We adopt the recommendation.
George A. Routh is reinstated as a member in good standing of The Florida Bar without restrictions or conditions. Execution is directed to issue for the costs of these proceedings against the respondent in the amount of $885.61.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, Acting C.J, and BOYD, OVERTON, McDonald and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Salvadore Arroyo v. State, 564 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)…unauthorized entry or remaining in a structure or conveyance, and (2) a specific intent to commit an offense therein. § 810.02(1), Fla.Stat. (1989); Toole v. State, 472 So. 2d 1174 (Fla.1985); Ellis v. State, 425 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 5th DCA), approved, 442 So. 2d 213 (Fla.1983). The state’s proof regarding the accused’s specific intent will almost always be circumstantial since the state will rarely have direct proof as to the defendant’s exact objectives, motives and intentions. Further, section 810.07, Florid…
-
Ginny L. Walker v. Fla. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg., 705 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)…sputed circumstantial evidence that Walker’s acts were intentional. Therefore, FREC’s conclusion that Walker violated section 475.25(l)(m) is supported by competent substantial evidence. See Ellis v. State, 425 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), app’d, 442 So. 2d 213 (Fla.1983) (circumstantial evidence is sufficient to prove intent). Finally, Walker argues that it was improper for FREC to revoke her license absent a specific showing that she was unscrupulous or dishonest. She argues that without such a showing…
-
Lucio John Salas v. State, 544 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)…mmit assault and battery. In a prosecution for burglary, it is not necessary for the state to allege intent to commit a specific offense, but the information must allege the essential statutory element of intent to commit an offense. Ellis v. State, 442 So. 2d 213 (Fla.1983); State v. Speights, 437 So. 2d 1387 (Fla.1983); State v. Waters, 436 So. 2d 66 (Fla.1983); State v. Fields, 390 So. 2d 128 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Furthermore, the omission in the information of an essential element of the crime of burglary…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- THE Florida BAR v. Routh, 414 So. 2d 1023 (Fla. 1982)