GEORGE L. FORM AND HELEN C. FORM, HIS WIFE, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
RAPHAEL STEINHARDT, APPELLEE; RAPHAEL STEINHARDT, APPELLANT, V. GEORGE L. FORM AND HELEN C. FORM, HIS WIFE, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1983-11-22
Nos. 83-1059, 83-1074
Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
441 So. 2d 1160 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1983) Caution
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Haskell v. Rollins, 653 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
    …Co., 639 So. 2d 1004, 1006 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 649 So. 2d 232 (Fla.1994) (holding that cotenants of property each possessing a one-half interest in property are each hable for one-half of the attorneys’ fees awarded); Daugharty v. Daugharty, 441 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), rev. denied, 450 So. 2d 486 (Fla.1984).…
  • Christyane Whitson v. Advocate 3413, 351 So. 3d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2022)
    …inst any or all of the parties in interest.")). Although it has been held that a party's attorney in a partition proceeding did not render services "of benefit to the partition" where the party's pleadings were frivolous, see Daugharty v. Daugharty, 441 So. 2d 1160, 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), in this case, Advocate 3413 has not alleged that Whitson's appeal was frivolous, and we specifically find that it was not. Accordingly, we remand both parties' motions to the trial court, which shall determine the parties'…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw