MICHAEL STEVEN NASH, APPELLANT,

v.

SUNSTREAM EQUIPMENT COMPANY AND AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Review Fin. Printers, Inc. v. Feldman, 478 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See American Atlantic Lines v. Ros Forwarding, Inc., 441 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Wolf v. Wright Brothers Paper Box Co., 226 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); Baya v. Price, 222 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); § 725.01, Fla.Stat. (1981).…
• Riba v. Pila, 543 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
  …bsence of a writing. Although unnecessary to our disposition in this case, we also agree with the appellant’s contention that the alleged promise would be unenforceable for lack of consideration. See American Atlantic Lines v. Ros Forwarding, Inc., 441 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). We, accordingly, reverse and remand for entry of final judgments in favor of the appellant. Reversed and remanded with instructions. SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.…
• Anglada v. Sprague, 822 F.2d 1035 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …auds prohibited an action based upon unwritten promises to pay the debts of third parties in the absence of any independent consideration running to the guarantor, citing Fla.Stat. § 725.01 (1981) and American Atlantic Lines v. Ros Forwarding, Inc., 441 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), second, that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a finding of fraud under Florida law, citing Shee-Con, Inc. v. Al Seim Appraisal Service, Inc., 427 So. 2d 311 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), and third, that the evidence did not show t…

Authorities Cited

• Arleen S. Rice v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 363 So. 2d 834 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
• Teala Ritter v. Jimenez, 343 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
• Haim Zerwal v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 332 So. 2d 645 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)
• Holmes v. The Sch. Bd. OF Orange Cnty., 301 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)
• Somers v. Meyers, 171 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965)
• James v. State, 171 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965)