ARTHUR R. DECATUR, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
ARTHUR R. DECATUR, APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE
392 F.2d 29
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Appellant mainly relies on a claim of illegal search and seizure. It is possible that there was an exploratory search too broad to be properly incident to De-Catur’s arrest. But it would appear that all of the tangible real objects offered in evidence were seized from points immediately adjacent to the spot where De-Catur was arrested. If some item crept into evidence that was illegally seized, no record was made in the trial court and we are not told what it was.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Philips Elec. & Pharm. Indus. Corp. v. Thermal & Elecs. Indus., Inc., 450 F.2d 1164 (3d Cir. 1971)
-
Research Corp. v. Nasco Indus., Inc., 501 F.2d 358 (7th Cir. 1974)
-
Julie Research Labs., Inc. v. Guildline Instruments, Inc., 501 F.2d 1131 (2d Cir. 1974)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence