CKN AIRWAYS, INC., AND JOHN OSTGARD, APPELLANTS,
v.
FLAGLER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
CKN Airways and John Ostgard appealed a judgment of eviction from Flagler County Airport, challenging both the trial court's jurisdiction and denial of their jury trial demand. The appellate court reversed, finding that while the complaint was mislabeled as declaratory relief when it was actually an eviction action, the defendants' counterclaims cured the jurisdictional defect, but the trial court erred in denying jury trial on the factual disputes.
The trial court's jurisdictional defect was cured by the defendants' timely filing of counterclaims exceeding $5,000, but the court erred in denying the defendants' repeated demands for a jury trial on the factual issues presented.
[1] A complaint misnomered as a suit for declaratory judgment may be sustained as a cause of action for eviction if it states sufficient allegations for eviction.
[2] Filing counterclaims seeking damages in excess of $5,000 prior to a motion to dismiss can cure a circuit court's jurisdictional defect.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the complaint, although misnomered as one for declaratory relief, stated a cause of action for eviction. As such, this action would be one properly brought only in the county court. However, the defendants' filing of counterclaims against Flagler seeking damages in excess of $5,000 prior to the filing of the motion to dismiss cured the circuit court's jurisdictional problem.”
Establishes that the jurisdictional defect was cured by counterclaims exceeding $5,000
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceCKN Airways and John Ostgard (as president and individual guarantor) held a lease to operate Flagler County Airport. Flagler County sued for cancellat…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Jury Trial Demand cases and more on FLexlaw
COBB, Judge.
This appeal concerns the basic issue of whether the appellants, CKN Airways, Inc., and John Ostgard, breached a lease agreement with Flagler County (hereinafter Fla-gler) relating to operation of the Flagler County Airport. Flagler sued for cancellation of the agreement and the eviction of CKN and Ostgard, who signed the lease as president of CKN and as an individual guarantor. The action by Flagler was filed as a suit for declaratory judgment. It asserted that the defendants had breached the lease agreement by failing to present evidence of insurance for all periods during the lease, assigning an interest in the lease without Flagler’s prior approval, and subleasing a portion of the airport for non-aviation purposes.
CKN and Ostgard moved to dismiss on the ground that the complaint was not properly one for declaratory relief, since it did not seek an interpretation of provisions of the lease, but merely sought eviction based upon allegations of breach by the defendants. See Barrett v. Pickard, 85 So. 2d 630 (Fla.1956); Halpert v. Olesky, 65 So. 2d 762 (Fla.1953); Kelner v. Woody, 399 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Although this contention was correct, the motions were properly denied because the complaint, although misnomered as one for declaratory relief, stated a cause of action for eviction. As such, this action would be one properly brought only in the county court.1 However-, the defendants’ filing of counterclaims against Flagler seeking damages in excess of $5,000 prior to the filing of the motion to dismiss cured the circuit court’s jurisdictional problem.
CKN and Ostgard also contend on appeal that the trial judge erred in denying their demand for a jury trial. We agree. Following the non-jury trial, the circuit judge resolved various factual conflicts against the defendants, as indicated by the following language from the Final Judgment of Eviction:
L. The Court finds and determines that there was conflicting evidence as to the sufficiency and adequacy of the performance by the Defendants at the airport facility under the lease, but the credible and believable evidence persuades the Court that the Defendants failed to materially perform a substantial number of the functions of the Flagler County Airport and materially comply with the terms of the lease dated December 15, 1977 to the extent there is a material breach of the lease agreement. The cumulative effect of the various violations of the lease by the Defendants supports the Plaintiff’s right to terminate the lease.
The circuit court was in error in denying the repeated demands by the defendants for a jury trial on the various factual issues presented by the complaint and the counterclaims. See Wincast Assn., Inc. v. Hickey, 342 So. 2d 77 (Fla.1977); Winter Garden Citrus Growers Assn., Inc. v. Willits, 113 Fla. 131, 151 So. 509 (1933); Kies v. Florida Ins. Guaranty Assn., Inc., 435 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Goldbloom v. Kislak, 408 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Olins, Inc. v. Avis, 131 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961). Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for jury trial.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
DAUKSCH and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur. . § 34.011(2), Fla.Stat. (1981).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Herrell v. Seyfarth, 491 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…mages by the parties exceeded the jurisdictional limit of the county court, see Section 34.01(l)(c)2, Florida Statutes, and because the tenant's suit for injunctive relief was triable in circuit court. See, e.g., CKN Airways, Inc. v. Flagler County, 441 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), pet. rev. dismissed, 447 So. 2d 886 (Fla. 1984) (claim for eviction and counterclaim for damages in excess of $5,000 placed jurisdiction in the circuit court to consider both issues); Gonzalez v. Benoit, 424 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 3d…
-
Baldwin SOD Farms, Inc. v. Corrigan, 746 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…aw and procedure provide for a jury trial is the question we must resolve. In arguing that it was entitled to a jury trial, Baldwin relies upon State ex rel Jennings v. Peacock, 126 Fla. 743, 171 So. 821 (1937); CKN Airways, Inc. v. Flagler County, 441 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983), rev. dismissed, 447 So. 2d 886 (Fla.1984); and Moffett v. MacArthur, 291 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). Jennings held that the county court erred in denying the tenant’s' request for a jury trial in an eviction proceeding becau…
Authorities Cited
- Halpert v. Oleksy, 65 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 1953)
- Gonzalez v. State, 399 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Olin's, Inc. v. AVIS Rental CAR Sys. OF Fla., 131 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961)
- Winter Garden Citrus Growers Ass'n v. Willits, 113 Fla. 131 (Fla. 1933)
- Barrett v. Pickard, 85 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 1956)
- Harlow J. Kies and Doris Kies v. Fla. Ins. Guar. Ass'n, Inc., 435 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)
- Gertrude S. Zullo v. Zullo, 342 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 1977)
- Goldbloom v. J. I. Kislak Mortg. Corp., 408 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)