UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
v.
WILLIAM BRADLEY KARGOE, APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE,
WILLIAM BRADLEY KARGOE, APPELLANT
391 F.2d 284
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The factual determination of the district judge made at the trial when he admitted defendant’s statements in evidence against him that the statements were freely and voluntarily made in full knowledge of defendant’s rights under Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964), was not clearly erroneous. We affirm the conviction and judgment entered thereon.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Johnson, 455 F.2d 311 (5th Cir. 1972)
-
United States v. Smith, 452 F.2d 638 (4th Cir. 1971)
Authorities Cited
- Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (U.S. 1966)
- Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (U.S. 1964)