JERRY L. LOCKETT ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
BOARD OF EDUCATION, MUSCOGEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, GEORGIA ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the District Court did not err in denying injunctive relief but should have required the Board to file a plan.
Appellants sought further relief via injunction in a school desegregation case. The Board assured the court it would follow the Jefferson decree, and …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Unitary School System cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
This appeal involves a further chapter in the conversion of the school system of Muscogee County, Georgia from a dual system based on race into a unitary system. The Board adopted its own plan and was in the process of effectuating it prior to suit. The considerable progress made to date has been without the sanction of an injunction. See Lockett v. Board of Education of Muscogee County School District, Georgia, 5 Cir., 1965, 342 F. 2d 225.
Appellants moved for further relief in the form of an injunction on the basis of United States v. Jefferson County Board of Education, 5 Cir., 1967, 372 F. 2d 836, 380 F. 2d 385. The Board assured the District Court that it intended to follow Jefferson. The court denied in junetive relief on this basis but retained jurisdiction of the cause.
We conclude that the District Court did not err in denying injunctive relief. We think, however, that the Board should file a plan with the court substantially following the provisions of the Jefferson decree. The case will be remanded so that this may be done. The District Court is authorized to waive the mailing requirement under the mandatory choice section of that decree provided it appears that an effective method of notice is available and will be used as a substitute.
Affirmed in part; vacated and remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lockett v. Bd. OF Educ. OF Muscogee Cnty. Sch. Dist., 111 F.3d 839 (11th Cir. 1997)
-
Lockett v. Bd. OF Educ. OF Muscogee Cnty. Sch. Dist., 92 F.3d 1092 (11th Cir. 1996)
Authorities Cited
- United States & Linda Stout v. Jefferson Cnty. Bd. OF Educ., 372 F.2d 836 (5th Cir. 1966)
- United States & Linda Stout v. Jefferson Cnty. Bd. OF Educ., 380 F.2d 385 (5th Cir. 1967)
- Lockett v. Bd. OF Educ. OF Muscogee Cnty. Sch. Dist., 342 F.2d 225 (5th Cir. 1965)