DANIEL ANTHONY BURNS, ALSO KNOWN AS DANIEL ANTHONY JASEK, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE

9th Cir. | 1968-02-26
No. 21890
390 F.2d 659 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1968) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Convicted of interstate transportation of a stolen car under the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312, appellant challenges the sufficiency of proof that the car found in his possession in Arizona was the same as the one stolen in Illinois. His attack is on testimony given by a Government witness and the basis of his attack is that the witness was not sufficiently qualified as an expert.

The testimony in question was not opinion testimony but was factual, and in our judgment was clearly competent.

Judgment affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw