JULES HAIRSTYLISTS OF MARYLAND, INC., A MARYLAND CORPORATION, AND JULES HAIRSTYLISTS, INC., A DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CORPORATION, AND JULES HAIRSTYLISTS OF VIRGINIA, INC., A VIRGINIA CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND IRVING MACHIZ, APPELLEES
JULES HAIRSTYLISTS OF MARYLAND, INC., A MARYLAND CORPORATION, AND JULES HAIRSTYLISTS, INC., A DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CORPORATION, AND JULES HAIRSTYLISTS OF VIRGINIA, INC., A VIRGINIA CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND IRVING MACHIZ, APPELLEES
389 F.2d 389
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM;
We affirm on the memorandum opinion of the district court.1
Affirmed.
. Jules Hairstylists of Maryland v. United States, 268 F.Supp. 511 (D.C.Md.1967).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bob Jones Univ. v. Simon, 416 U.S. 725 (U.S. 1974)
-
Hutchinson v. United States, 677 F.2d 1322 (9th Cir. 1982)
-
Eighth St. Baptist Church, Inc. v. United States, 431 F.2d 1193 (10th Cir. 1970)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence